Vacuum chamber with two-stage longitudinal translation for circuit board testing

ABSTRACT

A circuit board tester that uses a dual-stage translation to bring a unit under test (UUT) into physical and electric contact first with a series of tall probes, then with a series of short probes. Initially, the UUT is mounted on a support plate, and spaced apart from both the tall and short probes. First, in order to perform a functional test on the UUT, a first vacuum stage is engaged, and atmospheric pressure translates the UUT longitudinally until contact is made with a first hard stop, defining a first position. At this first position, the UUT is in contact with a series of tall probes, and is spaced apart from a series of short probes. After a function test is performed, a second vacuum stage is engaged in addition to, and independent of, the first vacuum stage. Atmospheric pressure translates the UUT longitudinally until contact is made with a second hard stop, defining a second position.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The patent application is a divisional and claims the benefit of U.S.application Ser. No. 10/867,164 filed Jun. 14, 2004 in the name ofAdams, et al. and entitled “Vacuum Chamber With Two-Stage LongitudinalTranslation for Circuit Board Testing” (Attorney Docket No.01790.0001-US-U1), which hereby is incorporated herein in its entiretyby reference thereto; and further claims the benefit of U.S. ProvisionalPatent Application Ser. No. 60/572,263 filed May 18, 2004 in the name ofAdams, et al. and entitled “Vacuum Chamber With Two-Stage LongitudinalTranslation for Circuit Board Testers” (Attorney Docket No.01790.0001-US-P1), which hereby is incorporated herein in its entiretyby reference thereto; and further claims the benefit of U.S. ProvisionalPatent Application Ser. No. 60/572,315, filed May 18, 2004 in the nameof Staggert and entitled “Plate With Coating for Visually DiscerningAmong Pre-Identified Holes” (Attorney Docket No. 01790.0003-US-P1),which hereby is incorporated herein in its entirety by referencethereto.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not Applicable

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

This invention is directed to test equipment, and more particularly totest equipment for circuit boards.

2. Description of the Related Art

Circuit board testers are used for testing a variety of circuit boardsor similar devices to assure that the circuit boards operate asintended. In at least one type of circuit board tester, such as AgilentModel No. 3070, Series 3, a separate device, referred to as a fixture,is used to position the circuit board such that a plurality ofelectrically conductive probes (which are part of, or coupled to, thetester) contact predetermined components or positions of the circuitboard. The particular components or positions that are contacted by thetest or probes depend on the tests that are desired. When the probes arein contact with the desired locations on the circuit board, electricalsignals with predetermined parameters (e.g., predetermined magnitudes orpatterns of current, voltage frequency, phase and the like) are appliedby the tester, typically under control of a computer, to certain of theprobes. Some or all of the probes are used to measure the performance orresponse of the circuit board (i.e., to measure electrical parameters atsome or all of the probes contacting the circuit board). In this way, itis possible to rapidly perform a number of tests or measurementscharacterizing the performance of the circuit board while simulating theconditions the circuit board would have, or could have, during actualuse. Although it is possible to use these types of tests (and testingdevices) for a variety of possible purposes (such as “spot checking”selected circuit boards at a production facility, testing circuit boardswhich may be malfunctioning, testing prototype circuit boards as part ofa design program and the like), in at least some applications, circuitboard testing is used to provide quality assurance on all orsubstantially all products of a given type or class which are producedby a company. Even with the relatively rapid test procedures which canbe achieved by in circuit testing, it is not unusual for desired testingof each circuit board to require on the order of 30 seconds to 90seconds or more.

Because, in at least some applications, circuit board testing isperformed on substantially all devices on a production line orproduction facility, speed and reliability of testing can be especiallyimportant since delay or failure at a testing station can delay orinterrupt the overall production in a production line or facility.Accordingly, it would be useful to provide a fixture, useable inconnection with in-circuit testers, which provides desired speed ofpositioning the circuit board or other unit under test (UUT) and whichachieves a relatively high degree of reliability, e.g., so as to avoidinterrupting or delaying production rates at a production line orfacility.

The effect of such testing on overall production rates is at leastpartially related to the rate at which each UUT can be placed in thefixture and the rate at which the fixture can accurately and reliablymove the UUT to the desired position or positions. In at least somesituations, it is desired to provide a tester with probes at two or morelevels (with respect to a direction normal to the plane of the UUT)e.g., by providing some probes having a first height and other probeshaving a second height. This arrangement affords the opportunity toperform two or more different sets of tests such that the points atwhich probes contact the UUT during one set of tests are different from(or a subset of) the points at which probes contact the UUT duringanother set of tests. Typically, in such a “dual stage” testingsituation, the UUT is first positioned so as to contact all probes (andperform a first set of tests), and then positioned to contact only thetaller set of probes (at points of the UUT which are determined by thelocation of the tall probes) and a second set of tests are performedusing only the taller probes. The order of the tests may be reversed, sothat the taller probes contact first, then the shorter probes contact.Although many different testing procedures can be used, as will beunderstood by those of skill in the art, in at least some situations,the taller probes may be used for functional tests and/or boundary scantests (such as boundary scan tests as described in IEEE Standard No.1149.1).

In at least one previous approach, the circuit board is moved in thedirection of the probes, typically causing the taller probes, which maybe provided with a spring-urged telescoping structure, to partiallycollapse or telescope, down to the level of the smaller probes, suchthat substantially both sets of probes (the taller probes and theshorter probes) contact the UUT at desired positions. With the boardheld in this position, a first set of tests (such as functional testsand/or boundary scan tests) can be performed. After tests are performedusing the full set of probes the vacuum is released such that the UUT ispositioned to contact only the taller probes (which telescope upwardly)and a second set of tests, (such as tests directed to measuringperformance or characteristics of individual components on the UUT) canbe performed.

In order for fixtures used in dual stage testing to operate well,especially in the context of a production line or facility, it is alsodesirable to avoid delays or malfunctions in moving the UUT between thestages. Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide a fixture, useableconnection with dual stage in-circuit testing, with a relatively highdegree of reliability and operating speed.

In at least one type of fixture, the force of atmospheric pressure isused to move the UUT towards the probes, e.g., by drawing a (partial)vacuum in a sealed area above or near the probes. In these devices, inorder to accommodate dual stage testing, such fixtures have, in thepast, been provided with a shuttle plate positioned in the areasomewhere above the probes and defining one or more standoff structureswhich engage or contact a surface of the fixture (or of the UUT) tolimit the amount of downward movement that the vacuum can effect on theUUT. In this way, the shuttle plate, in a first position, can cause theUUT to be positioned so as to contact only the taller probes. After afirst set of tests is performed, the vacuum is at least partiallyreleased and the shuttle plate is then moved, typically laterally, suchthat the standoffs slide against a surface of the fixture sufficientlyto become aligned with notches or other openings, allowing the(reapplied) vacuum to pull the UUT down farther, so as to contact thefull set of probes (so that a second set of tests can be performed). Itis also possible to perform tests with the full set of probes beforeperforming the tests using only the taller probes. In at least oneprevious device, a shuttle mechanism is located in the lid structure tohold the board down onto the long probes. This device requires pneumaticcylinders, and requires an additional operator connection of compressedair lines to the fixture.

While this arrangement can achieve dual stage positioning, it has beenfound that such a shuttle plate approach can lead to delays or failuresin testing. For example, the shuttle plate approach can provide arelatively high amount of friction when the shuttle plate is movedlaterally, particularly when components of the fixture are made of a G10or similar relatively high-friction material. This can lead to binding(inability of the shuttle plate to move smoothly to the second positionor return to the first position). Such binding can not only cause delaysand slow down a production line or production facility but can causefailures which may require repairs or replacement of parts, thuscreating a substantial interruption of production. Accordingly, it wouldbe useful to provide a fixture that can achieve dual stage testing whileavoiding the type of binding, delay, failure, or interruption associatedwith the use of a shuttle plate.

In at least some systems, pneumatic actuators are used to move the UUTtowards the probes. In these types of systems, the pneumatic actuatorsare configured and/or controlled so as to be movable among threepositions, an initial position, a position with the UUT in contact withthe taller probes and a position with the UUT in contact with allprobes. Pneumatic systems, unfortunately, are associated with certainundesirable qualities. Unlike an atmospheric pressure system, whichprovides pressure spread over a substantial area, preferably oversubstantially the entire surface of the UUT, pneumatic systems generallyprovide pressure only at discrete locations. In general, this leads to acertain amount of flexure of the UUT as it is moved by the pneumaticactuators which can lead to poor contact with the probes in somelocations of the UUT and, thus, inaccurate test results. Furthermore,pneumatic systems are generally relatively massive (e.g., such asresulting in fixtures weighing 40 to 50 pounds more than vacuumsystems). Generally, this means that changing from one fixture toanother (such as for routine maintenance, or to accomplish testing of adifferent type of UUT) will require two or more workers and/or liftingor positioning equipment, and will typically require more time thanchanging fixtures in a vacuum system, thus, leading to delays and/orinterruptions in a production line or production facility. This isparticularly true when the fixture is reinforced in an attempt to reducethe amount of flexure associated with pneumatic systems (although suchreinforcement is, typically, only partially successful such that evenreinforced systems may have an undesirable amount of flexure).Accordingly, it would be useful to provide a fixture which can be usedfor dual stage in-circuit testing which has a relatively low weight,e.g., compared with pneumatic-type fixtures, and/or imparts relativelylittle flexing on the UUT (e.g., compared with pneumatic-type fixtures),and otherwise achieves a low amount or probability of delays orinterruptions.

In a prior art system disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,535,008, the UUT,typically supported on a support plate that has perforationscorresponding to the probe positions, is held spaced from all of theprobes, e.g., by one or more springs. The prior art disclosure usesatmospheric pressure (by drawing a vacuum in the region adjacent theprobes) to move the UUT (against one urging of the springs) into aposition contacting all of the probes (i.e., both the short probes andthe long probes). Such use of atmospheric pressure as a moving forcereduces or substantially eliminates flexing of the UUT. In one aspect,in order to move the UUT to a second position, contacting only the tallprobes, the vacuum is substantially released but a (preferablyactuateable and/or controllable) structure limits the distance the UUTcan travel away from the probes (under urging of the springs) so as toposition the UUT at the desired location, contacting only the tallprobes. Because this movement of the prior art system does not requirethe lateral sliding of a shuttle plate (or its components), e.g.,against a high-friction surface and/or because this movement does notrequire relative sliding or other contact movement while components arepressed together by atmospheric pressure forces (since the vacuum hasalready been released, at least partially), there is relatively littletendency for binding during such movement and thus dual stage testingcan be achieved with relatively low incidence or probability of delay orfailure.

Stated another way, the prior art system of U.S. Pat. No. 6,535,008 usesa retractable arm that, when engaged into a slot, functions as a hardstop to longitudinal motion of the UUT with respect to the probes. Atone end of the slot, the UUT is brought into contact with the tallprobes, and at the other end, the UUT is brought into contact with theshort probes. Any longitudinal motion of the UUT is accomplished by asingle stage, driven by a single vacuum feed, and the extent of anylongitudinal motion during testing is limited by the engaged retractablearm.

A potential drawback of the prior art system of U.S. Pat. No. 6,535,008is that it still uses a translatable arm, which increases the complexityof the circuit tester system, and is subject to wear. Accordingly, itwould be useful to provide a fixture which can be used for dual stagein-circuit testing which has a relatively low weight, e.g., comparedwith pneumatic-type fixtures, and/or imparts relatively little flexingon the UUT (e.g., compared with pneumatic-type fixtures), increasesreliability by removing any laterally translatable parts, and otherwiseachieves a low amount or probability of delays or interruptions.

The testers generally contain a plate as part of the tester thatfunctions as a mechanical stand-off for the fixture. While the fixtureis held rigidly in place against the plate, or against rigid stand-offsfastened to the plate, the probes make contact with the circuit boardthrough various holes in the plate. The plates are usually supplied bythe tester manufacturer with regularly spaced holes, usually in arectangular grid, so that a given plate from the tester manufacturer maybe used to test a variety of circuits. Even though a circuit generallyrequires its own custom layout for the probe locations, the plate,because of its standardized hole configuration, may be used relativelyindependently of the specific locations of the probes, and may also bereused when the tester is reconfigured to test a new circuit. Thisstandardization of the hole locations reduces the number of custom partsrequired for a tester, and thereby reduces the cost of the system.

The plates are typically molded from a plastic material, such aspolycarbonate, so that the array of holes may be built right into themold. Because they are molded, not drilled, there is no additional costrequired for drilling the holes. In addition, the resulting plastic partis non-conducting, which is important for insulation of the electricallyconductive probes from each other. These plates are commerciallyavailable, and a model that fits the above-mentioned Agilent circuittester is sold as the “3070 alignment plate”.

A potential drawback to a completely standardized plate is that itgenerally requires considerable effort to identify particular holesduring the final inspection of the tester prior to usage. Typically, atechnician will have to verify the location of each probe manually, bycounting the row and column values of each probe (seen visually througha hole in the plate), then comparing the values to those in a publishedlist as part of the tester layout drawings. If there are dozens ofprobes, all specifically located in a rectangular array that containshundreds of identical-looking holes, this may be a very time-consumingprocedure for the technician, and may lead to errors in probe placementif the technician counts incorrectly. Accordingly, it would be useful toprovide a plate with simple identification features, so that atechnician may readily visually identify which holes are to acceptprobes.

One prior art solution is to manually mark each hole in the plate thatwill receive a probe during operation. This solution turns out to besimple in theory, but very labor-intensive, and therefore veryexpensive. Accordingly, it would be useful to provide a plate withsimple identification features that may be identified using the sametools that provide the tester configuration drawings (reducing thepossibility of human error in determining the locations.) Additionally,the identification features should be inexpensive, and not require acustom-fabricated plate for each particular circuit under test.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present embodiment uses a dual-stage translation to bring a unitunder test (UUT) into physical and electric contact first with a seriesof tall probes, then with a series of short probes.

Initially, the UUT is mounted on a support plate, and spaced apart fromboth the tall and short probes. First, in order to perform a functionaltest on the UUT, a first vacuum stage is engaged, and atmosphericpressure translates the UUT longitudinally until contact is made with afirst hard stop, defining a first position. At this first position, theUUT is in contact with a series of tall probes, and is spaced apart froma series of short probes. After a function test is performed, a secondvacuum stage is engaged in addition to, and independent of, the firstvacuum stage. Atmospheric pressure translates the UUT longitudinallyuntil contact is made with a second hard stop, defining a secondposition. At this second position, the UUT is in contact with both talland short probes (the tall probes being appropriately spring-loaded soas to maintain physical and electric contact with the UUT withoutdamaging the UUT). After an in-circuit test is performed, both vacuumstages are released, and the UUT returns to its initial location, spacedapart from both the tall and short probes. The UUT may be replaced withanother part to be tested, and the cycle is repeated.

A further embodiment has a plate with identification features, so that asubset of holes in the plate may be visually identified. A first side ofthe plate, preferably (although not necessarily) the side facing thefixture and circuit board during operation of the tester, is coated witha thin layer of paint at the factory, so that the area in between allthe holes is generally uniformly coated. The paint is preferably coloredin contrast to the unpainted color of the plate. A subset of the holesis identified, and the paint surrounding each hole in the subset isremoved.

Typically, when a tester is customized to test a particular circuit, aset of drawings is made by a computer assisted drawing (CAD) machine,well-known in the art, and presented to a technician. The technicianuses the drawings to configure the tester, and the drawings typicallyindicate the locations and types of the probes. Alternatively, the CADmachine may generate an automated set of instructions for placement ofthe probes during assembly of the tester. In the present invention, theCAD machine may generate an additional set of instructions for denotingwhich holes in the plate are to receive probes. The additionalinstructions may be used by an automated drilling machine that scrapesoff the paint in the area surrounding each hole that receives a probe.The drilling machine uses a drill bit of a larger diameter than thehole, and only drills until the paint is removed; it does not drillsubstantially into the plate itself and does not increase the diameterof the hole. Once the paint is removed around a particular hole, thehole is readily identified visually, either by eye or by use of amachine vision system. Once the tester is configured, each hole in thesubset should contain a probe, and no probes should be present in holesnot contained in the subset. Once all the probes are configured, a finalvisual inspection of the tester is relatively simple, as the technicianmay simply look at the plate and ensure that each hole in the subset hasa probe that extends through it, and that none of the probes extendthrough holes not in the subset.

The present embodiment has a circuit tester for testing for reliably andrepeatedly testing circuit boards in a plurality of different circuitconditions comprising a first circuit board mounting plate; a probeplate aligned with said circuit board mounting plate having a first setof probes of predetermined length and a second set of shorter probes; anadjuster for moving said first plate and said probe plate toward andaway from each other along a single axis from a first position whereinnone of said probes contact said the circuit board on said mountingplate, to a second position wherein said first probes contact saidcircuit board and to a third position wherein said first and secondprobes contact said circuit board so that said circuit board may betested under different conditions depending upon the probes in contacttherewith.

A further embodiment has a method of testing a circuit board on a testbed having a first set of compressible probes and a second set ofshorter probes, comprising the steps of: defining an axis of movementfor the test bed being generally coaxial with said probes; enclosingsaid test bed in a first compressible enclosure, said enclosure beingcapable of moving along said axis to urge said circuit board intocontact with at least some of said probes when in a compressed state;enclosing said test bed in a second compressible enclosure at leastpartly outside of said first enclosure, said second enclosure beingcapable of moving along said axis to urge said circuit board intocontact with at least some of said probes; providing a vacuum source forselectively withdrawing air from said first and second enclosuresthereby selectively drawing said first and second sets of probes intocontact said circuit board.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic of a circuit board tester.

FIG. 2 illustrates a schematic of a dual-stage circuit board tester in“rest” position.

FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic of a dual-stage circuit board tester in“functional test” position.

FIG. 4 illustrates a schematic of a dual-stage circuit board tester in“in-circuit test” position.

FIG. 5 is a schematic of a prior art grooved plate with a subset ofholes identified manually.

FIG. 6 is a schematic of a grooved plate with a subset of holesidentified according to an embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In a manufacturing environment for circuit boards, a final test willoften be an electrical test, to ensure that each circuit board performsas required. Such tests are well-known in the industry, and may beperformed by commercially available testers, such as Agilent Model 3070.

A basic schematic of a circuit board tester 1 is shown in FIG. 1. Acircuit board, often referred to as a unit under test (UUT) 2, ismounted on a fixture 3 for the duration of the test, which provides arugged mechanical mount for the UUT as well as a mechanical interfacewith other components in the tester 1. The fixture 3 is positioned on abed 4, so that various electrical probes may make contact with specificlocations on the UUT 2 and perform the desired tests. The probes mayapply and measure voltages or currents at various locations on the UUT2, and are controlled mechanically and electrically by the tester 1. Acomputer 5 may control the tester 1 and may record data from the tests.

A more detailed view of the mechanical configuration is shown in FIG. 2.The UUT 2 is removably and rigidly attached to, and is spaced apartfrom, a support plate or mounting plate 11 via spacer elements 12. Theelectrical contacts on the UUT 2 that are to be tested face downward,and are accessible by probes 13 a,b that extend through holes orapertures 14 contained in the support plate 11. The support plate 11also has regions that are devoid of holes or apertures 14. Fingers 15,attached to a vacuum box 16, hold the UUT 2 on the side opposite thesupport plate 11. The support plate 11 may be fastened to the vacuum box16 by supports 90 (omitted for clarity from FIGS. 3 and 4). The vacuumbox 16 rests on a set of second seals 17, and may be evacuated through avacuum connection 18, connected via a second valve 19 to a vacuum system20. Initially, during the loading and unloading of parts, and before anytests are performed, the second valve 19 is closed (as drawn in FIG. 1),and the volume 21 inside the vacuum box 16 is at atmospheric pressure.The second seals 17 may contain springs (not shown) or may contain acompressible material, such as a foam, so that the second seals 17compress when the vacuum box 16 is evacuated, and retain a generallyexpanded shape when the vacuum box 16 is at atmospheric pressure.

The second seals 17 rely on atmospheric pressure to change shape; whenthe second valve 19 is opened, the volume 21 is connected with a vacuumsystem 20 that pumps it down to a pressure below atmospheric pressure.The difference between atmospheric pressure and the pressure inside thevacuum box 16 is applied uniformly across the area of the vacuum box 16by the atmosphere, and a net force is applied downward on the vacuum box16, compressing the second seals 17.

With respect to FIG. 1, the fixture 3 includes the vacuum box 16, thesecond seals 17, the fingers 15, the UUT 2, the spacer elements 12, andthe support plate 11. The fixture is connected to the vacuum system 20by the vacuum connection 18. The vacuum connection 18 is typically ahose or pipe, and generally does not offer any mechanical support forthe fixture 3.

The second seals 17 rest upon a series of top plates 22. The top plates22 are permanently attached to a probe plate 24 through a series offirst seals 23. The first seals 23 may be similar in composition to thesecond seals 17, retaining a generally expanded shape in atmosphericpressure, and compressing under the influence of a vacuum.

The probe plate 24 contains a series of vacuum connections 25, connectedvia a first valve 26 to the vacuum system 20. When the first valve 26 isopened, the vacuum system 20 evacuates a volume, or series of volumes,bounded by the probe plate 24, the top plates 22, and the first seals23. When these volumes are pumped down to a pressure less thanatmospheric pressure, the first seals 23 compress under the influence ofnegative atmospheric pressure, as described above.

A series of first hard stops 27 is located between the first probe plate24 and the top plates 22, typically attached to the probe plate 24. Whenthe first valve 26 is opened, the first seals 23 compress until the topplates 22 contact the first hard stops 27. Because an accurate spacingis required between the probe plate 24 and the top plates 22, thisspacing is generally fixed by the thickness of the first hard stops 27.

The probe plate 24 also contains a series of second hard stops 28,located between the probe plate 24 and the support plate 11. Althoughthe second hard stops 28 are generally similar to the first hard stops27 in composition, they likewise may be fabricated from variousmaterials. The sizes of both first hard stops 27 and second hard stops28 are determined by the dimensions of the UUT 2 and the specific testsrequired. Thus the hard stops on all plates are of predetermineddimensions which provide a predicable stop point to the UUT at thevarious test positions. When both the first valve 19 and second valve 26are open, both the first seals 23 and second seals 17 compress until thesupport plate 11 contacts the second hard stops 28. Note that any or allof the hard stops may be built into the probe plate 24 itself, such asusing a series of grooves, stand-offs or depressions.

With respect to FIG. 1, the bed 4 includes the top plates 22, the firstseals 23, the probe plate 24, the first hard stops 27, the second hardstops 28, and the probes 13 a,b. The bed 4 is connected to the vacuumsystem 20 by the vacuum connection 25, typically a hose or pipe.

Although the probes 13 a, b are drawn in FIG. 2 as attached to the probeplate 24, the tall probe 13 a being appropriately spring-loaded so as tomaintain physical and electric contact with the UUT 2 without damagingthe UUT 2, the probes 13 a,b may in actuality be attached to a mechanismbeneath the probe plate 24, and the probes may extend through holes (notshown) in the probe plate 24. Although only two probes 13 a, b are shownin FIG. 2, it will be appreciated that the tester 1 may contain manymore probes 13 a,b, perhaps several dozen or more.

FIG. 2 shows the system in a “rest” position, which occurs both beforeand after any tests are performed. The first valve 26 and the secondvalve 19 are both closed, and the entire system is generally atatmospheric pressure. Both the first seals 23 and the second seals 17are extended. The top plates 22 are spaced apart from the first hardstops 27, and the support plate 11 is spaced apart from the second hardstops 28. Most importantly, all of the probes 13 a,b are spaced apartfrom the UUT 2 when the system is in a “rest” position.

FIG. 3 shows the system in a “functional test” position, in which thefirst valve 26 is open. The first seals 23 are compressed under theinfluence of the vacuum 20, as described above. (Note that the secondseals are not compressed.) The top plates 22 are brought into contactwith the first hard stops 27. Most importantly, the tall probe 13 a isbrought into contact with the UUT 2, while the short probe 13 b isspaced apart from the UUT 2. Although only two probes 13 a,b are drawnin FIG. 3, it will be appreciated that a plurality of both tall andshort probes are used in the device, and that in the “functional test”position, all of the tall probes are in physical and electrical contactwith the UUT 2, and all of the short probes are spaced apart from theUUT 2.

FIG. 4 shows the system in an “in-circuit test” position, in which boththe first valve 26 and the second valve 19 are open. Both the firstseals 23 and the second seals 17 are compressed under the influence ofthe vacuum 20, as described above. The support plate 11 is brought intocontact with the second hard stops 28. The short probe 13 b is broughtinto contact with the UUT 2. In addition, the long probe 13 a, which isappropriately spring-loaded, remains in contact with the UUT 2. Althoughonly two probes 13 a,b are drawn in FIG. 4, it will be appreciated thata plurality of both tall and short probes are used in the device, andthat in the “in-circuit test” position, both the tall and short probesare in physical and electrical contact with the UUT 2.

Generally, after a UUT 2 is removably attached to the support plate 11,a functional test is performed (FIG. 3—note that one valve is open andone is closed, and that only the tall probes are in contact with theUUT), followed by an in-circuit test (FIG. 4—note that both valves areopen, and that both the tall and short probes are in contact with theUUT). The UUT 2 is then detached from the support plate 11 and replacedwith another unit to be tested. It will be understood that this sequenceof events is a typical embodiment, and may be altered as necessary. Notealso that the “functional test”, shown in FIG. 3, may be performedequally well with either valve open, and the other valve closed.

While the actuating mechanism of FIGS. 2-4 is shown as a vacuum system,it will be appreciated that other methods, such as positive or change inpressure (i.e., the opposite of a vacuum) or non-pressure methods couldachieve similar results. For example, a solenoid system could substitutefor the vacuum without departing from the spirit of the invention.Likewise, a screw drive, or equivalent mechanical system for raising andlowering the plates would suffice.

Regardless of the type of actuating mechanism used, the actuated motionof the plates is preferably oriented largely parallel to the probes, sothat the probes remain aligned with their corresponding test points. Theactuated motions of the two stages are preferably substantially coaxialor collinear. In order to ensure coaxial motion, the two stages mayslide along common alignment pins or guide pins (not shown), which maypreferably be located outside the vacuum chambers, and may preferablyconstrain the relative motion of the two stages colinearly. Preferably,the common alignment pins lie generally parallel to the probes, alongthe direction 31 in FIG. 3. Preferably, the guide pins may be locatednear the corners of the plates in order to provide optimal stabilityduring motion.

As discussed earlier, the probe plate 24 may contain holes, throughwhich the probes pass. The probe plate is constructed as part of thetester, and is generally not removed or replaced between tests ofindividual parts. In general, certain holes in the probe plate aremarked in some manner before the tester is configured, in order to showwhich subset of the holes should receive probes.

FIG. 5 shows a prior art probe plate (or simply “plate”) 51, whichcontains a first face 56 and a plurality of holes 54. The holes 54 aredrawn in a rectangular array, but it will be appreciated that the holes54 may be configured arbitrarily on the plate 51. As used in a circuitboard tester, the plate 51 is typically built into the tester, andtypically provides a protective and alignment mechanical surface againstwhich parts may be held during the test procedure. (Note that the hardstops 27 and 28 may be incorporated into the plate 51 itself as a seriesof protrusion 53.) A fixture that contains a circuit board under testmay be placed rigidly in contact against the grooves 53 on the firstface 56 of the plate 51, and a plurality of electrical probes accessvarious points on the circuit board through various holes 54 in theplate 51. During the testing procedure, the probes apply and measurevarious voltages and currents at specific locations in a circuit boardunder test, generally to ensure that the circuit performs adequately.Typically, a single probe corresponds to a single hole 54 in the plate51.

Prior to usage of the tester, the various electrical probes must beconfigured to test specific locations in a particular circuit. The probelocations are typically generated at the CAD (computer assisteddrafting) level, usually by the same tools that lay out the componentson the circuit boards. The probe locations may be documented in CADdrawings and communicated to a technician that configures the probesmanually, or may be encoded and communicated electronically to anautomated device that configures the probes.

Once the tester probes are properly configured and the plate 51 isattached to the tester, a subset 54 a-54 h of the holes 54 in the plate51 will receive probes during operation of the tester. The remainder ofthe holes 54 that are not in the subset 54 a-54 h do not receive probesduring operation of the tester. It will be appreciated that the numberand locations of the holes in subset 54 a-54 h depend on the circuitunder test, and are relatively unimportant for the present invention.

The final step in the manufacturing process for the prior art plate 51is a manual identification of the subset 54 a-54 h of holes 54 thatreceive probes. The user identifies the subset 54 a-54 h of holes 54,produces a CAD drawing or file describing the locations of the subset 54a-54 h, and sends the drawing or file to the plate manufacturer. Themanufacturer of the prior art plate 51 then marks each hole 54 in thesubset 54 a-54 h by hand, typically by painting or marking a small areaaround each hole 54 in the subset 54 a-54 h on the first face 56. Thepaint or ink 55 is preferably in high contrast to the unpainted color ofthe bare plate 52. For example, if the bare plate 52 is a dark-coloredpolycarbonate material, then the paint or ink 55 should be a lightcolor, so that the marked holes are readily visibly detected, by eye orby a machine vision system. Although the marked areas surrounding eachhole 54 in the subset 54 a-54 h are drawn as circular in FIG. 1, it willbe appreciated that the markings may be of any shape or pattern, as longas each marking is readily identifiable with exactly one hole 54 in thesubset 54 a-54 h.

A severe drawback to the manual marking system of the prior art plate 51is that it is very labor-intensive, and therefore very expensive. For aplate 51 that requires dozens of markings, in an array with hundreds ofholes, the marking procedure can be quite significant, and in somecases, can be the greatest expense in producing the plates 51.

Although one may be tempted to fabricate a new plate for each circuitunder test, with holes only where probes are placed, this would beexpensive and largely impractical. The prior art plate 51 is generallymolded from a plastic material, such as polycarbonate, and has its holesincorporated into the mold itself. A custom prior art plate 51 molded inthis manner, with holes only where required by the user, would require acustom mold for each user, which is impractically expensive.Additionally, the drilling of holes in a blank plate, while possible, isalso more expensive than the prior art technique of manually marking theholes. Accordingly, there is a need for a plate that has a large numberof holes for flexibility, but has a way of inexpensively identifying asubset of the holes to simplify the final inspection of the tester.

FIG. 6 shows a present embodiment of a plate 61. A coating 65 is appliedto a first face 66 of an uncoated plate 62, preferably in the areabetween the protrusion 63. The protrusion 63 may be coated as well, butat the risk of flaking or peeling of the coating 65. The uncoated plate62 contains a plurality of holes 64, and the coating 65 does not fill inthe holes 64. The coating 65 may be a paint, a two-part epoxy, or another opaque coating, preferably of a color of a high contrast with thecolor of the uncoated plate 62. Preferably, the coating 65 is notelectrically conductive. For example, if the uncoated plate 62 isdark-colored, a suitable coating 65 may be commercially available“Polane T-White” paint.

Note that it is generally difficult to fabricate a coating 65 thatadheres well to a plastic uncoated plate 62. In preliminary tests, itwas found that standard paints did not adhere well to the polycarbonateplate. Often, the standard paints would chip during thehole-identification process so that more than one hole was exposed,effectively rendering the plate useless. These issues were resolved byfinding a suitable overcoat material that ensures proper bonding withthe uncoated plate.

Note also that the coating 65 may be formed in layers, in order tooptimize both adhesion and color contrast with the uncoated platematerial. For instance, a layer in closest proximity to the plate mayhave desirable adhesion properties, and a layer farthest away from theplate may have desirable color characteristics. It will be understood bythose skilled in the art that any suitable material, combination ofmaterials, or combination in layers may be used, without limiting thescope of the invention.

In a subset 64 a-64 h of holes 64, the coating 65 has been removed inthe region around each hole 64 in the subset 64 a-64 h, exposing thefirst face 66 underneath. Because the coating 65 contrasts with thecolor of the uncoated plate 62, each hole 64 in the subset 64 a-64 h isreadily visually identifiable, whether by eye or by a camera in amachine vision system. The coating 65 may be ablated by appropriatemethods, such as scraping, drilling, chipping, peeling, punching,grinding, and the like.

Preferably, the removal of the coating around each hole 64 in the subset64 a-64 h is performed by an automated tool, such as an automated drillthat receives a set of subset 64-64 h locations from a CAD file. Theautomated drill preferably uses a drill bit larger than the hole 64diameter, and drills only enough material to completely remove thecoating 65, without substantially drilling through the first face 66.For example, if the coating 65 has a thickness of roughly 0.1 mm, thenthe drill may remove roughly 0.5 mm of material. The uncoated plate 62may be substantially thicker than 0.5 mm. Note that drilling suchshallow holes is an inexpensive procedure compared to drillingcomparable through holes, and that very little waste material isproduced. The hole may be countersunk, if convenient. Additionally, ifthe user decides to add another hole 64 to the subset 64 a-64 h, he maymark the added hole by hand, simply by turning a drill bit centered inthe hole by hand and grinding for a few seconds; the coating 65 comesoff readily.

It will be understood that the protrusion 63 on the plate 61 are notessential for the present embodiment. A similar coating 65 may beapplied to an uncoated plate that has physical features other thangrooves, such as posts, or has no physical features at all. The coating65 may be applied to the regions between holes 64, so that when removed,the hole may be readily visibly identified by eye or by a machine visionsystem as part of the subset 64 a-64 f.

As used in a circuit board tester, the plate 61 of FIG. 6 would readilyidentify the subset 64 a-64 h of holes 64 that receive probes duringoperation. Because of the high contrast between the coating 65 and thecolor of the uncoated plate 62, the technician easily sees the exposedfirst face 66 in the regions around each hole 64 in the subset 64 a-64h, and can then quickly complete the final inspection of the probelocations prior to operation. If the technician finds any holes 64 inthe subset 64 a-64 h that are missing a probe, or finds a probe in ahole 64 that is not in the subset 64 a-64 h, he can take correctiveactions. Because the entire subset 64 a-64 h is visible all at once tothe technician, without the need for manually counting rows and columns,the efficiency of the inspection process is greatly improved.

1. A method of identifying locations for entry of probes into a test bedhaving a plurality of holes, the test bed having a surface of a firstcolor layer and a second color layer bonded to and overcoating saidfirst layer, comprising the steps of: overcoating the test bed surfacewith a second color securely bonded thereto; and ablating a portion ofsaid overcoated second color from said test bed adjacent selectedapertures, so that at said selected apertures, the apertures areimmediately identifiable by their color differential between said firstand second colors.
 2. The method of claim 1 wherein said ablating stepis countersinking said selected apertures to expose said first layer. 3.The method of claim 1 wherein said ablating step is punching saidselected apertures to expose said first layer.
 4. The method of claim 1wherein said ablating step includes ablating around said selectedapertures with a plurality of distinguishable patterns so that saidselected apertures can be distinguished.
 5. A method of identifyingspecific holes in an interface plate having one side of a predeterminedcolor and first and second subsets of probe holes comprising: a)covering an area adjacent said first and second holes with an indicator;b) removing the indicator adjacent holes of said first subset; so thatholes of first and second subsets can be distinguished from each otherby the differential between the color and the indicator.
 6. The methodof claim 5 wherein said indicator is removed by scraping a portion awaygenerally concentrically relative a hole.
 7. The method of claim 5wherein said removal is done by drilling away the indicator.
 8. A methodof identifying specific holes in a probe plate have a surface ofpredetermined color and having first and second subsets of probe holescomprising: a) adhering an indicator adjacent said first and secondsubset holes; b) removing the indicator adjacent holes of said firstsubset; so that holes of first and second subsets can be distinguishedfrom each other.
 9. The method of claim 8 wherein the indicator is acolorant and wherein the colorant is visually distinguishable from thecolor and wherein the step of removing said colorant is ablation.